• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Jandris Block

  • Products
    • Architectural CMU
      • Ground Face CMU
      • Polished CMU Series
      • Weathered Polished Series
      • Split Face CMU
      • Smooth Face CMU
      • Fluted & Prism CMU
    • Standard CMU
    • Insulated CMU
    • Soundblox
    • Ballast Block
    • Low Embodied Carbon CMU
    • Keystone® Retaining Walls
      • Standard II / Compac II
      • Victorian Stone
      • Verazzo Stone
      • Keystone® Installation
      • Dealer list
      • Keystone® Gallery
    • Concrete Products Group
  • Resources
    • Fire Ratings
    • Guide Specifications
    • Installation + Cleaning
    • TEK Notes & eDetails
  • Project Gallery
  • Sustainability
    • Facility
    • Inherent Sustainability
    • EPDs & HPDs
    • CarbonX
  • About Us
    • Our Company
    • History
  • Hey Heidi
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Type I (N-1) moisture control units

Posted on January 31, 2017

Share this gallery:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Q: Why are Type I (N-1) moisture control units no longer available?
-Moisture Unit N-1: Can you Help Investigate the Elusive?

A: 

Dear MUNCHIE:

Prior to 2000, ASTM C-90 included two designations: Type I moisture-controlled units, and Type II non-moisture controlled units. Type I (N-1) units were stipulated to have a maximum moisture content at the time of delivery. In theory, limiting the moisture content of the units reduces dry shrinkage, which would allow a maximum distance between control joints.

While true in theory, dry shrinkage is largely a function of the moisture content at the time of installation and not at the time of delivery. Because delivery rarely coincides with installation, units delivered as Type I had the potential to no longer meet the moisture requirements when installed. To avoid this, the designations were removed from C-90. This effectively made all concrete masonry units non-moisture controlled. While having no negative impact on the quality of CMU, industry control joint spacing recommendations were adjusted to accommodate the designation removal. For crack control, the following rule of thumb was established; horizontal joint reinforcement every 16 inches, with a maximum spacing between control joints 1 ½ times the height of the wall, not to exceed 25 feet.

Is this too many control joints MUNCHIE? Another way to figure control joint spacing would be to use the Alternative Engineered Method shown in NCMA TEK 10-3. Here, a ratio between horizontal reinforcement and control joint spacing can be figured. The more steel in the wall, the more space there can be between control joints. For both methods, special considerations need to be taken with large openings, corners, etc. To find NCMA TEK notes, go to our website and click on the Resources tab.

If you have any burning questions related to Concrete Masonry you can ask it here, tweet Heidi  Follow us on Twitter, or connect on Linkedin View our profile on LinkedIn

Heidi Jandris is a technical expert and trusted voice of the industry.  She part of the family business’s 3rd generation, grew up immersed in all things concrete block and worked as a welder at the plant before getting her BArch at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn NY. She is the Sustainability Manager and provides technical and design services for A. Jandris & Sons.

Primary Sidebar

The RILEM tube test and Concrete Masonry – not good partners

The RILEM tube test and Concrete Masonry – not good partners

February 21, 2019

Thermal Mass & Passing Code Using COMcheck™

Thermal Mass & Passing Code Using COMcheck™

January 22, 2019

Continuous Insulation (C.I.):                                                                                                                 Not a Code Requirement

Continuous Insulation (C.I.): Not a Code Requirement

November 1, 2018

Hey Heidi Blog

Jandris Block
202 High Street | Gardner, MA 01440-3632
Tel. 978-632-0089
© 2023 Jandris Block All Rights Reserved