• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Jandris Block

  • Products
    • Architectural CMU
      • Ground Face CMU
      • Polished CMU Series
      • Weathered Polished Series
      • Split Face CMU
      • Smooth Face CMU
      • Fluted & Prism CMU
    • Standard CMU
    • Insulated CMU
    • Soundblox
    • Ballast Block
    • Low Embodied Carbon CMU
    • Keystone® Retaining Walls
      • Standard II / Compac II
      • Victorian Stone
      • Verazzo Stone
      • Keystone® Installation
      • Dealer list
      • Keystone® Gallery
    • Concrete Products Group
  • Resources
    • Fire Ratings
    • Guide Specifications
    • Installation + Cleaning
    • TEK Notes & eDetails
  • Project Gallery
  • Sustainability
    • Facility
    • Inherent Sustainability
    • EPDs & HPDs
    • CarbonX
  • About Us
    • Our Company
    • History
  • Hey Heidi
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Code Based R-Values vs. Effective R-Values

Posted on August 1, 2017

Share this gallery:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Q: For pre-insulated Concrete Masonry systems, what is the difference between code based R-values & effective R-values? 
-Misleading Effective R Values 

A: 

Dear MERV,

 For concrete masonry, effective R-values typically mean that the R-value is adjusted to account for the thermal mass of a CMU wall system. It can also take into account other variables, such as thermal lag or annual averages. Code based R-values are calculated based on either test data or the method described in the ASHRAE Handbook – the series parallel (isothermal planes) method. Code based R-values are reported under strictly defined conditions, such as exterior and interior temperature, still air on the inside of the assembly and a defined wind mph on the outside. Code based R-values remain the same whether in Alaska, Florida and all of the climate zones in between. There a few reasons using effective R-values are problematic. Since effective R-value adjustments typically take in to consideration the benefits of thermal mass, and the benefits of thermal mass change due to the climate, effective R-values calculated in Arizona would be very different from effective R-values calculated in New England. Another problem with using effective R-values is code compliance. The energy code already takes into account the benefits of thermal mass for each climate zone, allowing mass walls to have less insulation. In the 2015 IECC for climate zone 5 (Massachusetts) the prescriptive insulation R-value requirement for a mass wall is 11.4. A wood framed structure requires an R of 20 and a metal structure requires an R-value of 27.5. Using effective R-values would essentially be double dipping. For more information, see NCMA TEK 6-2. 

For questions related to Concrete Masonry you can ask it here, tweet Heidi  Follow us on Twitter, or connect on Linkedin View our profile on LinkedIn

Heidi Jandris is a technical expert and trusted voice of the industry.  She part of the family business’s 3rd generation, grew up immersed in all things concrete block and worked as a welder at the plant before getting her BArch at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn NY. She is the Sustainability Manager and provides technical and design services for A. Jandris & Sons.

Primary Sidebar

The RILEM tube test and Concrete Masonry – not good partners

The RILEM tube test and Concrete Masonry – not good partners

February 21, 2019

Thermal Mass & Passing Code Using COMcheck™

Thermal Mass & Passing Code Using COMcheck™

January 22, 2019

Continuous Insulation (C.I.):                                                                                                                 Not a Code Requirement

Continuous Insulation (C.I.): Not a Code Requirement

November 1, 2018

Hey Heidi Blog

Jandris Block
202 High Street | Gardner, MA 01440-3632
Tel. 978-632-0089
© 2023 Jandris Block All Rights Reserved